您現在的位置:首頁 > 雅思

2019年1月12日雅思考試閱讀回憶(版本合集!)

  • 時間:2019-01-15

  • 來源:留學監(jiān)理網

推薦訪問:

你的同學在這里:

  • ●(1小時前) 海南的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問
  • ●(1小時前) 江蘇的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(2小時前) 浙江的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:查詢中介口碑 推薦留學中介
  • ●(2小時前) 上海的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:查詢中介口碑 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(2小時前) 河北的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問 推薦留學中介 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(2小時前) 北京的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:推薦留學中介
  • ●(3小時前) 陜西的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(5小時前) 湖北的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(8小時前) 陜西的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(8小時前) 內蒙古的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:查詢中介口碑 預約中介顧問
  • ●(12小時前) 港澳臺及國外的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:查詢中介口碑 推薦留學中介
  • ●(1天前) 黑龍江的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:推薦留學中介 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(1天前) 河北的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問 推薦留學中介 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(1天前) 貴州的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(1天前) 河北的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問
  • ●(1天前) 上海的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:推薦留學中介 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(1天前) 新疆的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:推薦留學中介
  • ●(1天前) 海南的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:推薦留學中介
  • ●(1天前) 陜西的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:預約中介顧問 推薦留學中介 留學監(jiān)理服務
  • ●(1天前) 天津的X同學使用了留學監(jiān)理網服務:查詢中介口碑
去看看 >

請在下方選擇您想領取的材料,可多選哦~

限量免費獲取
各位考鴨,新年的第二場雅思考試已經結束啦!這次能否和雅思“分手”了呢?小編為大家整理了本場考試的真題回憶內容,一起來看看都考到哪些題目吧!以下是本場考試閱讀回憶內容。

各位考鴨,新年的第二場雅思考試已經結束啦!這次能否和雅思“分手”了呢?小編為大家整理了本場考試的真題回憶內容,一起來看看都考到哪些題目吧!以下是本場考試閱讀回憶內容。


雅思閱讀回憶.jpg


>>>免費下載2019年1月12日雅思考試真題回憶匯總.pdf


{版本1}


Passage 1


文章題材:說明文(人文實驗)

文章題目:對于臉盲癥的研究

文章難度:★★

文章內容:待補充

題型及數量:待補充

題目及答案:待補充

可參考真題:C13T1P2:Why being is stimulating-and useful, too


沖刺雅思高分,讓你離世界TOP 30名校更近一步>>>【免費雅思成績測試】


雅思廣告圖.jpg


Passage 2


文章題材:說明文(自然科普)

文章題目:Mammoth kill (猛犸象)

文章難度:★★★

文章內容:文章介紹了猛犸象在外觀和生活習性等方面,與現代大象之間關系。并且比較了了三位科學家(John Alroy,Graham和MacPhee)對于猛犸象可能原因的猜想。

題型及數量:段落填空題7+人名匹配題6

題目及答案:

14. hunting

15. overkill model

16. disease

17. empirical evidence

18. climatic instability

19. geographical ranges

20. Younger Dryas event

21. A

22. B

23. A

24. B

25. B

26. C


可參考真題:C12T4P2:Bring back the big cats


考試原文:


Mammoth Kill

Mammoth is any species of the extinct genus Mammuthus, proboscideans commonly equipped with long, curved tusks and, in northern species, a covering of long hair. They lived from the Pliocene epoch from around 5 million years ago, into the Holocene at about 4,500 years ago, and were members of the family Elephantidae, which contains, along with mammoths, the two genera of modern elephants and their ancestors.


A Like their modern relatives, mammoths were quite large. The largest known species reached heights in the region of 4m at the shoulder and weights up to 8 tonnes, while exceptionally large males may have exceeded 12 tonnes. However, most species of mammoth were only about as large as a modern Asian elephant. Both sexes boretusks. A first, small set appeared at about the age of six months and these were replaced at about 18 months by the permanent set. Growth of the permanent set was at a rate of about 1 to 6 inches per year. Based on studies of their close relatives, the modern elephants, mammoths probably had a gestation period of 22 months, resulting in a single calf being born. Their social structure was probably the same as that of African and Asian elephants, with females living in herds headed by a matriarch, whilst bulls lived solitary lives or formed loose groups after sexual maturity.


B MEXICO CITY-Although it's hard to imagine in this age of urban sprawl and automobiles. North America once belonged to mam moths, camels, ground sloths as large as cows, bear-size beavers and other formidable beasts. Some 11,000 years ago, however, these large bodied mammals and others-about 70 species in all-disappeared. Their demise coincided roughly with the arrival of humans in the New World and dramatic climatic change-factors that have inspired several theories about the die-off. Yet despite decades of scientific investigation, the exact cause remains a mystery. Now new findings offer support to one of these controversial hypotheses: that human hunting drove this megafaunal menagerie to extinction. The overkill model emerged in the 1960s, when it was put forth by Paul S. Martin of the University of Arizona. Since then, critics have charged that no evidence exists to support the idea that the first Americans hunted to the extent necessary to cause these extinctions. But at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Mexico City last October, paleoecologist John Alroy of the University of California at Santa Barbara argued that, in fact, hunting-driven extinction is not only plausible, it was unavoidable. He has determined, using a computer simulation, that even a very modest amount of hunting would have wiped these animals out.


C Assuming an initial human population of 100 people that grew no more than 2 percent annually, Alroy determined that if each band of, say, 50 people killed 15 to 20 large mammals a year, humans could have eliminated the animal populations within I, 000 years. Large mammals in particular would have been vulnerable to the pressure because they have longer gestation periods than smaller mammals and their young require extended care.


D Not everyone agrees with Alroy's assessment. For one, the results depend in part on population-size estimates for the extinct animals-figures that are not necessarily reliable. But a more specific criticism comes from mammalogist Ross D.E.MacPhee of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, who points out that the relevant archaeological record contains barely a dozen examples of stone points embedded in mammoth bones (and none, it should be noted, are known from other megafaunal remains)-hardly what one might expect if hunting drove these animals to extinction. Furthermore, some of these species had huge ranges-the giant Jefferson's ground sloth, for example, lived as far north as the Yukon and as far south as Mexico-which would have made slaughtering them in numbers sufficient to cause their extinction rather implausible, he says.


E MacPhee agrees that humans most likely brought about these extinctions (as well as others around the world that coincided with human arrival), but not directly. Rather he suggests that people may have introduced hyperlethal disease, perhaps through their dogs or hitchhiking vermin, which then spread wildly among the immunologically naive species of the New World. As in the overkill model, populations of large mammals would have a harder time recovering. Repeated outbreaks of a hyperdisease could thus quickly drive them to the point of no return. So far MacPhee does not have empirical evidence for the hyperdisease hypothesis, and it won't be easy to come by: hyperlethal disease would kill far too quickly to leave its signature on the bones themselves. But he hopes that analyses of tissue and DNA from the last mammoths to perish will eventually reveal murderous microbes.


F The third explanation for what brought on this North American extinction does not involve human beings. Instead its proponents blame the loss on the weather. The Pleistocene epoch witnessed considerable climatic instability, explains paleontologist Russell W.Graham of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. As a result, certain habitats disappeared, and species that had once formed communities split apart. For some animals, this change brought opportunity. For much of the megafauna, however, the increasingly homogeneous environment left them with shrinking geographical ranges-a death sentence for large animals, which need large ranges. Although these creatures managed to maintain viable populations through most of the Pleistocene, the final major fluctuation-the so- called Younger Dryas event-pushed them over the edge, Graham says. For his part, Alroy is convinced that human hunters demolished the titans of the lce Age. The overkill model explains everything the disease and climate scenarios explain, he asserts, and makes accurate predictions about which species would eventually go extinct. "Personally, I'm a vegetarian," he remarks, "and I find all of this kind of gross-but believable."


Passage 3


文章題材:說明文(自然科普)

文章題目:失重

文章難度:★★★

文章內容:待補充

題型及數量:待補充

可參考真題:C9T2P2:Venus in transit


{版本2}


Passage 1:臉盲的研究

難度評級:二星


Passage 2:猛犸象

難度評級:三星


Passage 3:失重

難度評級:三星


2019年1月12日雅思考試真題回憶


雅思聽力2019年1月12日雅思聽力回憶
雅思口語2019年1月12日雅思口語回憶
雅思寫作2019年1月12日雅思寫作回憶
雅思考試(匯總)2019年1月12日雅思考試回憶(匯總)



>>>一鍵輸入GPA(2.0-4.0),雅思成績,快速匹配你適合申請國外哪所院校



免費院校專業(yè)評估.jpg



留學規(guī)劃和留學申請是一項復雜的長期工程,不能片面聽取網友的交流,更不能輕信留學中介的說辭。留學監(jiān)理網由有20多年國際教育行業(yè)管理和服務經驗的前教育部官員胡本未老師創(chuàng)立,得到新華社央視網的高度評價。留學監(jiān)理網免費為學生提供留學咨詢規(guī)劃建議、推薦靠譜的留學機構、審核留學方案和中介服務協(xié)議,受學生委托提供監(jiān)理服務、督辦留學中介的服務過程并“先行賠付”。


免費推薦靠譜專業(yè)的留學中介機構


任何關于雅思考試問題,比如雅思閱讀考試有哪些注意事項,雅思閱讀評分標準、雅思考試注意事項、國外大學對雅思成績要求是多少等問題,大家都可以在線咨詢或持續(xù)訪問該欄目的其它相關文章。


相關閱讀:

2019年1月5日雅思考試真題回憶匯總(版本合集!)

2019年1月5日雅思考試寫作回憶(版本合集!)

2019年1月5日雅思考試閱讀回憶(版本合集!) 

2019年1月5日雅思考試口語回憶

2019年1月5日雅思考試聽力回憶(版本合集!)


免費留學咨詢申請表(免費推薦留學中介/審核留學方案/獲取權威留學資料等)

留學監(jiān)理網不是留學中介,作為監(jiān)督平臺,5年以上工作經驗的留學監(jiān)理師能給你最客觀公正的建議,幫你辨別留學中介為你提供的咨詢信息。

*姓名:

*電話:

*郵箱:

QQ:

微信:

你希望:

*留學意向:

*出國就讀:

*出國時間:

中教安學?留學監(jiān)理網祝你申請成功,留學順利

(特別申明:本站除原創(chuàng)圖片外,其他圖片來源于網絡,版權歸作者所有,如有侵權,請聯系我們刪除。)

找留學中介?先問留學監(jiān)理網
不走彎路,更有保障

4000-315-285

自己選擇留學中介,可能遇到以下問題:
  陷阱合同 霸王條款
  推脫責任 不斷拖延
  無端承諾 胡亂收費
  申請失敗 拖延退費

我們幫你規(guī)避風險,免費推薦留學機構/項目:
  監(jiān)理師一對一科學分析 定向推薦
  預約高水平的專業(yè)顧問 拒絕隨機
  審查中介所供留學方案 保障安全
  審核留學中介合同,規(guī)避陷阱

請幫我推薦留學中介

或進入個人中心申請

留學志愿參考系統(tǒng)

跟我差不多情況的學長們都申請去了哪里?輸入自身情況,真實案例比對,助你快速留學定位。流程:注冊/登錄>輸入自身情況>留學方案定位

自身最高學歷

就讀院校類型

平均績點成績

語言成績:

中教安學?留學監(jiān)理網祝你申請成功,留學順利

最新文章

登陸成功,歡迎使用留學監(jiān)理網!